What's wrong with the word resource?

We sometimes hear the argument that humans are not resources. From those trying to upset the status quo of HR, that we still call human resources.

I suppose that notion could make sense if you were referring to MBAs try to commoditize a workforce as economic output, or leaders treating staff like cattle.

But still... As humans we are all resources, or if you prefer, super resources. We use our personal resources (assets if you will) when we serve others.

We each offer unique knowledge, skills, strengths, talents, experiences, creativity, and points of view. And further, we often act... well... resourcefully.

That's why we hire humans. We want someone resourceful on our team, we hire them for what they can do, and what we believe they can do.

So then, what's wrong with the word resource?

Probably nothing... Unless you hire a resource, rather than a person.

That might be their point.